Metaphilosophy 37 (1):112–129 (2006)
Kant has argued that moral requirements are categorical. Kant's claim has been challenged by some contemporary philosophers; this article defends Kant's doctrine. I argue that Kant's claim captures the unique feature of moral requirements. The main arguments against Kant's claim focus on one condition that a categorical imperative must meet: to be independent of desires. I argue that there is another important, but often ignored, condition that a categorical imperative must meet, and this second condition is crucial to understanding why moral requirements are not hypothetical. I also argue that the claim that moral requirements are not categorical because they depend on desires for motivation is beside the point. The issue of whether moral requirements are categorical is not an issue about whether moral desires or feelings are necessary for moral motivation but are rather an issue about the ground of moral desires or moral feelings. Moral requirements are categorical because they are requirements of reason, and reason makes moral desires or feelings possible.
|Keywords||subjective end intrinsic end hypothetical imperative categorical imperative moral feeling objective end|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers, 1973-1980.Bernard Arthur Owen Williams - 1981 - Cambridge University Press.
Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1991 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?John McDowell - 1978 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 52:13-29+31-42.
Citations of this work BETA
Blogger Engagement Ethics: Dialogic Civility in a Digital Era.Jeremy Langett - 2013 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 28 (2):79-90.
Similar books and articles
Do Hypothetical Imperatives Require Categorical Imperatives?Jeremy Schwartz - 2010 - European Journal of Philosophy 18 (1):84-107.
Michael Smith and the Daleks: Reason, Morality, and Contingency.James Lenman - 2009 - Utilitas 11 (2):164.
Kant's Conception of Inner Value.Oliver Sensen - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 19 (2):262-280.
The Education of the Categorical Imperative.James Scott Johnston - 2006 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 25 (5-6):385-402.
Education in Moral Theory and the Improvement of Moral Thought.Jonathan Friday * - 2004 - Journal of Moral Education 33 (1):23-33.
Right and Coercion: Can Kant's Conception of Right Be Derived From His Moral Theory?Marcus Willaschek - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (1):49 – 70.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads77 ( #68,454 of 2,172,662 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #75,840 of 2,172,662 )
How can I increase my downloads?