The Monist 68 (3):388-402 (1985)
Abstract |
Ronald Dworkin, beginning in about 1967, has written a series of articles attacking the dominant contemporary theory of law, the legal positivism of H. L. A. Hart. Dworkin’s articles, while largely critical, go far towards establishing his own theory of the law, a theory that while never explicitly and succinctly formulated can nonetheless be reconstructed from his critical remarks. The theory is a combination of positivism and natural law theory, and indeed has been named by one of its critics, “The Third Theory of Law.”
|
Keywords | Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy General Interest Philosophy of Mind Philosophy of Science |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 0026-9662 |
DOI | 10.5840/monist198568333 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The "Hart-Dworkin" Debate : A Short Guide for the Perplexed.Scott J. Shapiro - 2007 - In Arthur Ripstein (ed.), Ronald Dworkin. Cambridge University Press. pp. 22--49.
Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism: Dworkin and Hegel on Legal Theory.Thom Brooks - 2007 - Georgia State University Law Review 23 (3):513-60.
Should Constitutional Judges Be Philosophers?Christopher L. Eisgruber - 2006 - In Scott Hershovitz (ed.), Exploring Law's Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford University Press.
Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy: The Influence of H.L.A. Hart.H. L. A. Hart & Ruth Gavison (eds.) - 1987 - Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2012-03-18
Total views
56 ( #204,797 of 2,519,514 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,514 )
2012-03-18
Total views
56 ( #204,797 of 2,519,514 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,514 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads