Improving the quality of case-based research in the philosophy of contemporary sciences

Synthese 198 (10):9591-9610 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper aims to address some methodological issues related to case-based research in the philosophy of contemporary sciences. We focus on the selection processes by which philosophers pick or generate a particular set of papers to conduct their case-based research. We illustrate how to use various quantitative and qualitative methods to improve the epistemic features of the selection processes, and help generate some potential case-based hypotheses for further philosophical investigation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mechanism-based theorizing and generalization from case studies.Petri Ylikoski - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 78 (C):14-22.
Comparing alternatives in the law.Jaap Hage - 2004 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (3):181-225.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-18

Downloads
37 (#409,683)

6 months
9 (#250,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Karen Yan
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
What’s so special about model organisms?Rachel A. Ankeny & Sabina Leonelli - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (2):313-323.

View all 20 references / Add more references