Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):627-627 (2003)
We draw an analogy between Hilbert's program (HP) for mathematics and Newell's program (NP) for cognitive modeling. The analogy reveals that NP, like HP before it, is fundamentally flawed. The only alternative is a program anchored by an admission that cognition is more than computation.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Logicist Manifesto: At Long Last Let Logic-Based Artificial Intelligence Become a Field Unto Itself.Selmer Bringsjord - 2008 - Journal of Applied Logic 6 (4):502-525.
Similar books and articles
How Metaphysical is “Deepening the Foundations”?: Hahn and Frank on Hilbert’s Axiomatic Method.Michael Stöltzner - 2002 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 9:245-262.
The Russellian Influence on Hilbert and His School.Paolo Mancosu - 2003 - Synthese 137 (1-2):59 - 101.
“Clarifying the Nature of the Infinite”: The Development of Metamathematics and Proof Theory.Jeremy Avigad - manuscript
Lieber Herr Bernays!, Lieber Herr Gödel! Gödel on Finitism, Constructivity and Hilbert's Program.Solomon Feferman - 2008 - Dialectica 62 (2: Table of Contents"/> Select):179–203.
Proof-Theoretic Reduction as a Philosopher's Tool.Thomas Hofweber - 2000 - Erkenntnis 53 (1-2):127-146.
Hilbert's Program Then and Now.Richard Zach - 2006 - In Dale Jacquette (ed.), Philosophy of Logic. North Holland. pp. 5--411.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #248,994 of 2,144,254 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #185,831 of 2,144,254 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.