Ratio 20 (1):108-121 (2007)
AbstractSartre’s commentary on bad faith is the starting-point for an exploration of self-deception: what it is not, what it is, and whether it’s always wrong. The proffered analysis of selfdeception parallels a certain theory of our experience of fiction. In essence, it is argued that the self-deceiver creates a kind of fiction in which he is a character, a fiction that he nonetheless believes to be real
Similar books and articles
Emotions, fiction, and cognitive architecture.Aaron Meskin & Jonathan M. Weinberg - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (1):18-34.
The Scope of Fiction: Comments on Tim Button's 'Where Fiction Ends and Reality Begins' 'Where Fiction Ends and Reality Begins'.Ioannis Votsis - unknown
Between fiction and reflection: Foucault and the experience-book. [REVIEW]Timothy Rayner - 2003 - Continental Philosophy Review 36 (1):27-43.
Self-deception vs. self-caused deception: A comment on professor Mele.Robert Audi - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):104-104.
Images of corporate executives in recent fiction.Bernard Sarachek - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (3):195 - 205.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Words, Space, and the Audience: The Theatrical Tension between Empiricism and Rationalism.Michael Y. Bennett - 2012 - New York, NY, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
References found in this work
No references found.