Boredom and the Divided Mind

Res Philosophica 92 (4):937-957 (2015)

Vida Yao
Rice University
On one predominant conception of virtue, the virtuous agent is, among other things, wholehearted in doing what she believes best. I challenge this condition of wholeheartedness by making explicit the connections between the emotion of boredom and the states of continence and akrasia. An easily bored person is more susceptible to these forms of disharmony because of two familiar characteristics of boredom. First, that we can be – and often are – bored by what it is that we know would be best to do, and second, that occurrent states of boredom tend to give rise to positive interest in performing actions that we know are bad to perform. Moreover, while a person’s susceptibility to boredom can indicate a lack of attentiveness or acuity, or be evidence of a vice such as ingratitude or shallowness, it can in others indicate positive qualities of character, such as perspicacity, liveliness, and certain forms of intelligence. Upon imagining certain bored akratics without the psychological qualities that give rise to their boredom, we will either imagine them without these positive qualities, or with others that – though perhaps psychologically possible – are not clearly better. This yields the result that a person who is continent or even akratic because of her susceptibility to boredom may have a character no less excellent than that of the wholehearted agent.
Keywords boredom  akrasia  virtue  weakness of will  wholeheartedness  character  enkrasia
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.11612/resphil.2015.92.4.5
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,474
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Reasons of Love.Harry G. Frankfurt - 2004 - Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
The Morality of Happiness.Julia Annas - 1993 - Oxford University Press.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Immortality and Boredom.John Martin Fischer & Benjamin Mitchell-Yellin - 2014 - The Journal of Ethics 18 (4):353-372.
Boredom.W. O'Brien - 2014 - Analysis 74 (2):236-244.
A Philosophy of Boredom.Lars Svendsen - 2005 - Reaktion Books.
Henri Lefebvre and the 'Sociology of Boredom'.M. E. Gardiner - 2012 - Theory, Culture and Society 29 (2):37-62.
Boredom with Husserl and Beyond.Janko Lozar - 2014 - Prolegomena 13 (1):107-121.
The Bright Side of Boredom.Andreas Elpidorou - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
Living with Boredom.Cheshire Calhoun - 2011 - Sophia 50 (2):269-279.
My Own Criticism Ofthe Joyless Economy.Tibor Scitovsky - 1996 - Critical Review 10 (4):595-605.


Added to PP index

Total views
54 ( #156,747 of 2,273,296 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #253,240 of 2,273,296 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature