From nature to history, and back again: Blumenberg, Strauss and the Hobbesian community

History of the Human Sciences 15 (3):53-73 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article explores the origins of the problematic of political community by considering it in relation to the founding principles of `modern thought'. These principles are identified with the extirpation of moral values and ends from nature, in keeping with the rise of a `disenchanted' and mechanical scientific world-view. The transition from an `ancient' to a `modern' world-view is elaborated by drawing upon the work of Hans Blumenberg and Leo Strauss. The `demoralization' of nature, it is claimed, projects the formation of the political commons into the space of history, a space within which community must be produced via artifice on the part of the willing subject. This Leitbild of modern community is examined through a reading of Hobbes's Leviathan which, it is claimed, stands as the founding attempt to remember the political commons from the sphere of human immanence, without recourse to natural or theological externality. However, it is argued, nature occupies an intermediary and ambiguous position in Hobbes's thought, at once transcended and reinscribed into political life as a `hedonist anthropology' that defines the human animal. Further, Hobbes's insistence that conventionally produced standards need be misrecognized as necessary and non-contingent undermines their legitimacy from the standpoint of human autonomy. This failure to break decisively with the appeal to nature leads to a political community that is at best a simulacrum, far removed from the vision of ethical unity that characterizes the classical conception of the polis and political life. Yet, it is argued, Hobbes's strategy nevertheless presents the key to subsequent attempts to complete a political `revolt' against nature, as developed in the thought of Rousseau, Kant and Hegel



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,869

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hobbes and the ‘Greek tongues’.M. Berent - 1996 - History of Political Thought 17 (1):36-59.
Odi et Amo? Hobbes on the State of Nature.Andrés Rosler - 2011 - Hobbes Studies 24 (1):91-111.
Hobbes and Psychological Egoism.Bernard Gert - 1967 - Journal of the History of Ideas 28 (4):503-520.
Blumenberg, Politics, Anthropology.Brad Tabas - 2012 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2012 (158):135-153.
The primacy of ethics: Hobbes and Levinas. [REVIEW]Cheryl L. Hughes - 1998 - Continental Philosophy Review 31 (1):79-94.
Murray Bookchin and the domination of nature.Giorel Curran - 1999 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2 (2):59-94.
Leo Strauss and Nietzsche.Laurence Lampert - 1996 - University of Chicago Press.
Natural Subjects: Nature and Political Community.Kimberly K. Smith - 2006 - Environmental Values 15 (3):343 - 353.


Added to PP

12 (#813,293)

6 months
2 (#325,240)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Natural Right and History (Chicago, 1953).Leo Strauss - 1953 - The Correspondence Between Ethical Egoists and Natural Rights Theorists is Considerable Today, as Suggested by a Comparison of My" Recent Work in Ethical Egoism," American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (2):1-15.
What Is Political Philosophy?Leo Strauss - 1962 - Philosophy 37 (142):366-368.

View all 17 references / Add more references