Critical Notice: Mind and Cosmos

Analysis 73 (4):801-806 (2013)
Authors
David Yates
Universidade de Lisboa
Abstract
A critical assessment of Thomas Nagel's book, Mind and Cosmos, drawing out two independent notions of intelligibility, between which I argue Nagel equivocates in his central arguments.
Keywords Evolutionary explanation  Natural teleology  Natural teleology  Emergence
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/ant062
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mind and Cosmos.Thomas Nagel - 2012 - Oxford Up.
The Machiavellian Cosmos.Anthony J. Parel - 1992 - Yale University Press.
The Birth of the Cosmos.Paul Davies - 1995 - In P. C. W. Davies & Jill Gready (eds.), God, Cosmos, Nature, and Creativity. Scottish Academic Press.
The Cosmos and God.John B. Cobb Jr - 1995 - In P. C. W. Davies & Jill Gready (eds.), God, Cosmos, Nature, and Creativity. Scottish Academic Press.
Mind and Cosmos.Robert Garland Colodny - 1966 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
Quandaries of Mind, Brain, and Cosmos.Robert M. Anderson Jr - 1978 - International Philosophical Quarterly 18 (2):215-222.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-08-11

Total downloads
327 ( #13,449 of 2,308,619 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #38,397 of 2,308,619 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature