Response‐dependence

Philosophical Books 49 (4):344-354 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper covers a range of topics of recent interest in relation to response-depdendence: its characterisation in terms of 'basic equations', its application to areas such as ethics, colour theory and philosophy of mind, and the 'missing explanation' argument.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1468-0149.2008.00473.x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Realism and response-dependence.Philip Pettit - 1991 - Mind 100 (4):587-626.
Two conceptions of response-dependence.Rafael De Clercq - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 107 (2):159-177.
Noumenalism and Response-Dependence.Philip Pettit - 1998 - The Monist 81 (1):112-132.
Response-Dependence and Aesthetic Theory.Alex King - 2023 - In Chris Howard & Rach Cosker-Rowland (eds.), Fittingness. OUP. pp. 309-326.
Response-Dependence of Concepts Is Not for Properties.Eyja M. Brynjarsdóttir - 2008 - American Philosophical Quarterly 45 (4):377 - 386.
Realism or Response Dependence.Mark Powell - 1998 - European Review of Philosophy 3:1-13.
Response-Dependence.Christine Tappolet & Roberto Casati - 1998 - European Review of Philosophy 3:227.
Pragmatism, Truth and Response-Dependence.Andrew Howat - 2005 - Facta Philosophica 7 (2):231-253.
Functionalist response-dependence avoids missing explanations.D. J. Bradley - 2011 - Analysis 71 (2):297-300.
The Aposteriority of Response-Dependence.Nenad Miscevic - 1998 - The Monist 81 (1):69-84.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
927 (#20,561)

6 months
126 (#39,485)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Yates
Universidade de Lisboa

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references