Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (1):166-186 (2011)
We evaluate the consistency of different constructs affecting risk attitude in individuals’ decisions across different levels of risk. Specifically, we contrast views suggesting that risk attitude is a single primitive construct with those suggesting it consists of multiple latent components. Additionally, we evaluate such constructs as sensitivity to losses, diminishing sensitivity to increases in payoff, sensitivity to variance, and risk acceptance (the willingness to accept probable outcomes over certainty). In search of trait-like constructs, the paper reviews experimental results focusing on the consistency of these constructs in different tasks as well as their temporal consistency. Overall, the findings show that the most consistent factor is risk acceptance, and they also demonstrate its potential boundaries. These results are modeled with a simple quantitative index of subjective risk. A survey of decisions under risk further reveals that participants exhibit almost no consistency across different tasks in this setting, highlighting the advantage of experiential tasks for studying individual differences
|Keywords||Risk taking Cognitive style Experience Individual differences|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.) - 1982 - Cambridge University Press.
Comparison of Decision Learning Models Using the Generalization Criterion Method.Woo‐Young Ahn, Jerome R. Busemeyer, Eric‐Jan Wagenmakers & Julie C. Stout - 2008 - Cognitive Science 32 (8):1376-1402.
Citations of this work BETA
Cognitive Models of Risky Choice: Parameter Stability and Predictive Accuracy of Prospect Theory.Andreas Glöckner & Thorsten Pachur - 2012 - Cognition 123 (1):21-32.
Similar books and articles
A Virtue Ethical Account of Making Decisions About Risk.N. Athanassoulis & A. Ross - 2010 - Journal of Risk Research 13 (2):217.
Executive Functions in Decision Making: An Individual Differences Approach.Wändi Bruine de Bruin, Timo Mäntylä & Fabio Del Missier - 2011 - Thinking and Reasoning 16 (2):69-97.
Varieties of Risk Representations.John Kadvany - 1997 - Journal of Social Philosophy 28 (3):123-143.
Temporal Risk Aversion: What Determines the Attitude of the Decision Maker? The Case of the Buyer Decision Maker.Paola Ferretti - unknown
Ethical Standards, Attitudes Toward Risk, and Intentional Noncompliance: An Experimental Investigation. [REVIEW]Dipankar Ghosh & Terry L. Crain - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (5):353 - 365.
Causal Effects of Regulatory, Organizational and Personal Factors on Ethical Sensitivity.Denise M. Patterson - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 30 (2):123 - 159.
Risk-Free Decision-Making.John F. Lobuts & Carol L. Pennewill - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (1):29 - 37.
An Experiment on Rational Insurance Decisions.Richard Watt, Francisco J. Vázquez & Ignacio Moreno - 2001 - Theory and Decision 51 (2/4):247-296.
Expected Utility and Risk.Paul Weirich - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):419-442.
Dispositional Anger and Risk Decision-Making.Elisa Gambetti & Fiorella Giusberti - 2009 - Mind and Society 8 (1):7-20.
Risk Vulnerability: A Graphical Interpretation.Louis Eeckhoudt & Béatrice Rey - 2011 - Theory and Decision 71 (2):227-234.
Added to index2011-01-11
Total downloads75 ( #68,008 of 2,153,497 )
Recent downloads (6 months)21 ( #18,162 of 2,153,497 )
How can I increase my downloads?