Regulatory Misconception Muddies the Ethical Waters: Challenges to a Qualitative Study

Journal of Clinical Ethics 23 (3):217-220 (2012)

Abstract
In “Potential Subjects’ Responses to an Ethics Questionnaire in a Phase I Study of Deep-Brain Stimulation in Early Parkinson’s Disease,” Finder, Bliton, Gill, Davis, Konrad, and Charles undertake informed consent research on what they describe as a Phase I trial of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. We argue that the authors should have more carefully characterized the nature of the DBS study at the start of their clinical study.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,474
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Fortitude and Community: Response to Yee and Ford.Stuart G. Finder & Mark J. Bliton - 2012 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 23 (3):221-223.
Unrealistic Optimism and the Ethics of Phase I Cancer Research.J. Crites & E. Kodish - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (6):403-406.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-15

Total views
27 ( #326,183 of 2,273,318 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #320,037 of 2,273,318 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature