Human reproductive cloning community, identity, stability : reinventing creation

Abstract

This thesis examines the moral, ethical and legal aspects of reproductive human cloning. After examining the facts about cloning, this thesis tackles the difficult question of whether humans should be cloned. This is explored through an in-depth analysis of the moral and ethical acceptability of human cloning. The author concludes that human cloning should never be attempted and that consequently such a practice should be permanently prohibited by a legal norm.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,363

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

What's So Bad About Human Cloning?Yitzchok Breitowitz - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (4):325-341.
A Clone by any Other Name.Katherin A. Rogers - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (9999):247-255.
Cloning humans from the perspective of the Christian churches.R. Cole-Turner - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (1):33-46.
A wolf in sheep’s cloning?Richard Hanley - 1999 - Monash Bioethics Review 18 (1):59-62.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-07

Downloads
33 (#356,269)

6 months
1 (#451,398)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The New Biotech World Order.Lisa Sowle Cahill - 1999 - Hastings Center Report 29 (2):45-48.

Add more references