Parity, Intransitivity, and a Context-Sensitive Degree Analysis of Gradability

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (2):313-335 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Larry Temkin challenged what seems to be an analytic truth about comparatives: if A is Φ-er than B and B is Φ-er than C, then, A is Φ-er than C. Ruth Chang denies a related claim: if A is Φ-er than B and C is not Φ-er than B, but is Φ to a certain degree, then A is Φ-er than C. In this paper I advance a context-sensitive semantics of gradability according to which the data uncovered by Temkin and Chang leave both statements intact.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,362

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
101 (#183,118)

6 months
7 (#564,683)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Essential Contestability and Evaluation.Pekka Väyrynen - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (3):471-488.
Shapelessness in Context.Pekka Väyrynen - 2012 - Noûs 48 (3):573-593.
Thick Concepts and Underdetermination.Pekka Väyrynen - 2013 - In Simon T. Kirchin (ed.), Thick Concepts. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 136-160.
Meaning and More Meaningful. A Modest Measure.Peter Baumann - 2015 - Journal of Philosophy of Life 5 (3):33-49.
Rational Intransitive Preferences.Peter Baumann - 2022 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 21 (1):3-28.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The possibility of parity.Ruth Chang - 2002 - Ethics 112 (4):659-688.
Intransitivity of preferences.Amos Tversky - 1969 - Psychological Review 76 (1):31-48.
Intransitivity and the mere addition paradox.Larry S. Temkin - 1987 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 16 (2):138-187.
A Continuum Argument for Intransitivity.Larry S. Temkin - 1996 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 25 (3):175-210.
Parity, interval value, and choice.Ruth Chang - 2005 - Ethics 115 (2):331-350.

View all 20 references / Add more references