Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (3):289-314 (2007)
AbstractThis paper will defend scientific study of the social by scrutinizing Clifford Geertz's interpretive anthropology, and evolutionary psychologists' criticism of it. I shall critically examine Geertz's identification of anthropology with literary criticism, his assumption that a science of society is possible only on a positivist model, his view of the relation between culture and mind, and his anti anti-relativism. Then I shall discuss evolutionary psychologists' criticism of Geertz's view as an exemplar of the so-called "Standard Social Science Model." Finally, I shall claim that both Geertz and evolutionary psychologists misunderstand the aim of the social sciences, which is to explain the unintended consequences of human actions in institutional contexts. Key Words: Clifford Geertz evolutionary psychology interpretive anthropology positivism Standard Social Science Model (SSSM).
Similar books and articles
Religion as world-view and ethic.Clifford Geertz - 2009 - In Daniel L. Pals (ed.), Introducing Religion: Readings From the Classic Theorists. Oxford University Press.
Anthropology as Science and the Anthropology of Science and of Anthropology or Understanding and Explanation in the Social Sciences, Part II.I. C. Jarvie - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:745 - 763.
Interview with Clifford Geertz.Neni Panourgiá & Pavlos Kavouras - 2008 - In E. Neni K. Panourgia & George E. Marcus (eds.), Ethnographica Moralia: Experiments in Interpretive Anthropology. Fordham University Press.
Doing the Right Thing in Cross-Cultural Representation:The Predicament of Culture. James Clifford; Writing Culture. James Clifford, George E. Marcus; Works and Lives. Clifford Geertz; Anthropology as Cultural Critique. George E. Marcus, Michael M. J. Fischer. [REVIEW]Thomas McCarthy - 1992 - Ethics 102 (3):635-.
Uncovering "Cultural Meaning": Problems and Solutions.Todd Jones - 2004 - Behavior and Philosophy 32 (2):247 - 268.
Commentary on professor tu's paper.Clifford Geertz - 1981 - Philosophy East and West 31 (3):269-272.
Ideology, semiotics, and Clifford Geertz: Some Russian reflections.Andrey Zorin - 2001 - History and Theory 40 (1):57–73.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Anthropology as a Natural Science Clifford Geertz’s Extrinsic Theory of the Mind.Alphonso Lingis - 2014 - Open Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):96-106.
The logic of inquiry in social sciences, the case of economics in particular.Valentin Cojanu - 2009 - Social Science Information 48 (4):587-607.
Harre's Social Philosophy and Political Philosophy: A Social Scientific Critique.Carl Ratner - 2009 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 39 (4):448-465.
Naturalizmus versus interpretativizmus ve společenských vědách.Martin Paleček - 2010 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 17 (3):303-321.
References found in this work
The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language.Steven Pinker - 1994/2007 - Harper Perennial.