Informal Logic 24 (1):1-22 (2004)

Authors
Jeffrey Yoshimi
University of California, Merced
Abstract
Although debate is a richly structured and prevalent form of discourse, it has received little scholarly attention. Logicians have focused on the structure of individual arguments—how they divide into premises and conclusions, which in turn divide into various constituents. In contrast, I focus on the structure of sets of arguments, showing how arguments are themselves constituents in high-level dialectical structures. I represent debates and positions by graphs whose vertices correspond to arguments and whose edges correspond to two inter-argument relations: “dispute” and “support,” respectively. On this basis I develop a theory of the structure of debate.
Keywords debate, argumentation analysis, argument diagrams, argument visualization, dialectics, discourse analysis
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,719
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Uses of Argument.STEPHEN TOULMIN - 1958 - Philosophy 34 (130):244-245.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Some Reflections on the Informal Logic Initiative.Ralph H. Johnson - 2009 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 16 (29).
Diagramming Objections To Independent Premises.Cathal Woods - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (2):139-151.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-07-18

Total views
72 ( #132,300 of 2,349,836 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #331,717 of 2,349,836 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes