Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):628-628 (2003)
The criterion of computational universality for an architecture should be replaced by the notion of compliancy, where a model built within an architecture is compliant to the extent that the model allows the architecture to determine the processing. The test should be that the architecture does easily – that is, enables a compliant model to do – what people do easily.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Allure of Connectionism Reexamined.Brian P. McLaughlin & F. Warfield - 1994 - Synthese 101 (3):365-400.
Cognitive Architectures Have Limited Explanatory Power.Prasad Tadepalli - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):622-623.
Cognitive Architectures as Lakatosian Research Programs: Two Case Studies.Richard P. Cooper - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (2):199-220.
The Past, Present, and Future of Cognitive Architectures.Niels Taatgen & John R. Anderson - 2010 - Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (4):693-704.
Mind Architecture and Brain Architecture.Camilo J. Cela-Conde & Gisèle Marty - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (3):327-340.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #476,249 of 2,143,881 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #185,831 of 2,143,881 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.