Kivy on Musical Genius

British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (1):1-12 (2011)
Peter Kivy argues that Handel was the first composer to be regarded as a genius and that only in the eighteenth century was the philosophical apparatus in place that would enable any composer to be conceived of as a musical genius. According to Kivy, a Longinian conception of genius transformed Handel into a genius. A Platonic conception of genius was used to classify Mozart as a genius. Then Kant adopted a Longinian conception of genius and this shaped the perception of Beethoven. Kivy is wrong on all counts. Composers were thought to be geniuses long before Handel. The emergence of philosophical aesthetics in the eighteenth century did little to shape conceptions of musical genius. More specifically, Kivy misrepresents Kant's conception of genius and the role that it plays in the recognition of Beethoven as a musical genius
Keywords philosophy of music  genius
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/aesthj/ayq052
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,300
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Genius: A Very Short Introduction.Andrew Robinson - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Kant on Genius and Art.Bradley Murray - 2007 - British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (2):199-214.
Emerson on Socrates and the Tyranny of the Majority.Andrew Payne - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:203-207.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
21 ( #243,308 of 2,193,100 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #59,795 of 2,193,100 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature