Moral agency and the unity of the world: The neo-confucian critique of "vulgar learning"

Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33 (4):479–489 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1540-6253.2006.00376.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Neo-Confucian Orthodoxy and the Learning of the Mind-and-Heart. [REVIEW]Dale Riepe - 1984 - International Studies in Philosophy 16 (1):82-83.
Trouble with korean confucianism: Scholar-official between ideal and reality.Kim Sungmoon - 2009 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (1):29-48.
Dao Companion to Neo-Confucian Philosophy.John Makeham (ed.) - 2010 - New York: Springer.
"WHY BE MORAL?" The Cheng Brothers' neo-confucian answer.Yong Huang - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (2):321-353.
Essentials of contemporary Neo-Confucian philosophy.Shuxian Liu - 2003 - Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
The thought of Chang Tsai (1020-1077).Ira E. Kasoff - 1984 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Confucian moral realism.JeeLoo Liu - 2007 - Asian Philosophy 17 (2):167 – 184.
Moral agency and the unity of the world: The neo-confucian critique of "vulgar learning".Youngmin Kim - 2006 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33 (4):479-489.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
21 (#695,936)

6 months
10 (#219,185)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references