Abstract
In brief compass, I will touch on three of the central ethical and public policy issues that divide those who are opposed to physician-assisted dying from those who are supportive of this practice. These are: the moral distinction between actively hastening death and passively allowing to die; how to interpret the Hippocratic tradition in medicine with respect to physician-assisted death; and whether physician-assisted suicide can be effectively regulated. I shall summarize the arguments pro and con with respect to each issue, and also indicate my own position
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0963180100003145
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,661
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Aid-in-Dying Laws and the Physician's Duty to Inform.Mara Buchbinder - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (10):666-669.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Does Physician Assisted Suicide Violate the Integrity of Medicine?Richard Momeyer - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (1):13-24.
Conscience, Referral, and Physician Assisted Suicide.Kevin WM Wildes - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (3):323-328.
Ending Life, Morality, and Meaning.Jukka Varelius - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3):559-574.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
42 ( #227,573 of 2,340,027 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #516,585 of 2,340,027 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes