Theory and Decision 50 (2):149-167 (2001)
Research has established that exposure to a combination of diagnostic (i.e., relevant) and nondiagnostic (i.e., irrelevant) information results in predictions that are more regressive than predictions based on diagnostic information (Hackenbrack, 1992; Hoffman and Patton, 1997). This phenomenon has been labeled the dilution effect (e.g., Tetlock and Boettger, 1989) and has been documented when individuals make predictions. This study tests for the dilution effect when small groups make predictions, and examines the effect of using a procedure designed to reduce the dilution effect. Results indicate that group predictions are influenced by nondiagnostic information in the same manner as are individual predictions, and allowing participants to rate the diagnosticity of information prior to making predictions does not reduce the dilution effect
|Keywords||Dilution effect Nondiagnostic information Small groups Individual predictions Uncertain outcome|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Learning From Examples Does Not Prevent Order Effects in Belief Revision.Frank E. Ritter, Josef F. Krems & Martin R. K. Baumann - 2011 - Thinking and Reasoning 16 (2):98-130.
The Group Calibration Index: A Group-Based Approach for Assessing Forecasters' Expertise When External Outcome Data Are Missing. [REVIEW]Ilan Fischer & Ravid Bogaire - 2012 - Theory and Decision 73 (4):671-685.
Dynamics of Theory Change: The Role of Predictions.Stephen G. Brush - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:133 - 145.
Informatics and Society: Will There Be an 'Information Revolution'? [REVIEW]Lorne Tepperman - 1985 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (5):395 - 399.
The Objectivity and Invariance of Quantum Predictions.Gordon N. Fleming - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:104 - 113.
Framing and the Theory-Simulation Controversy. Predicting People's Decisions.Josef Perner & Anton Kühberger - 2002 - Mind and Society 3 (2):65-80.
Intentional Action and the Semantics of Gradable Expressions (On the Knobe Effect).Paul Egré - forthcoming - In B. Copley & F. Martin (eds.), Causation in Grammatical Structures. Oxford University Press.
A More Fulfilling (and Frustrating) Take on Reflexive Predictions.Matthew Kopec - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (5):1249-1259.
Action Synchronization with Biological Motion.William F. Thompson, John Sutton & Lincoln Colling - unknown
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads33 ( #155,600 of 2,169,146 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #82,265 of 2,169,146 )
How can I increase my downloads?