Smell's puzzling discrepancy: Gifted discrimination, yet pitiful identification

Mind and Language 35 (1):90-114 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mind &Language, Volume 35, Issue 1, Page 90-114, February 2020.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

How to do things with modals.Matthew Mandelkern - 2019 - Mind and Language 35 (1):115-138.
Sex & Secularism, by Joan Wallach Scott. [REVIEW]Edward Andrew - 2019 - The European Legacy 25 (1):103-114.
Smell identification and the role of labels.Giulia Martina - forthcoming - Philosophical Psychology.
Perception, discrimination, and knowledge.Laura Frances Callahan - 2020 - Philosophical Issues 30 (1):39-53.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-23

Downloads
1,073 (#18,021)

6 months
117 (#45,165)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Benjamin D. Young
University of Nevada, Reno

Citations of this work

A Critique of Olfactory Objects.Ann-Sophie Barwich - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
Olfactory Amodal Completion.Benjamin D. Young & Bence Nanay - 2021 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 103 (2):372-388.
Olfactory imagery: is exactly what it smells like.Benjamin D. Young - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 177 (11):3303-3327.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans - 1982 - Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edited by John Henry McDowell.
The Language of Thought.J. A. Fodor - 1978 - Critica 10 (28):140-143.
The Varieties of Reference.Louise M. Antony - 1987 - Philosophical Review 96 (2):275.

View all 63 references / Add more references