Argumentation 32 (4):569-587 (2017)
AbstractWhether abduction is treated as an argument or as an inference, the mainstream view presupposes a tight connection between abduction and inference to the best explanation. This paper critically evaluates this link and supports a narrower view on abduction. Our main thesis is that merely the hypothesis-generative aspect, but not the evaluative aspect, is properly abductive in the sense introduced by C. S. Peirce. We show why equating abduction with IBE unnecessarily complicates argument evaluation by levelling the status of abduction as a third reasoning mode. We also propose a scheme for abductive argument along with critical questions, and suggest retaining abduction alongside IBE as related but distinct categories.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
Common Cause Abduction: Its Scope and Limits.Patryk Dziurosz-Serafinowicz - 2012 - Filozofia Nauki 20 (4).
Four Problems of Abduction: A Brief History.Anya Plutynski - 2011 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (2):227-248.
Philosophy and Cognitive Science Ii: Western & Eastern Studies.Woosuk Park, Ping Li & Lorenzo Magnani (eds.) - 2015 - Springer Verlag.
Problems with Peirce's Concept of Abduction.Michael Hoffmann - 1999 - Foundations of Science 4 (3):271-305.
How Did Abduction Get Confused with Inference to the Best Explanation? Mcauliffe - 2015 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 51 (3):300.
How Did Abduction Get Confused with Inference to the Best Explanation? Mcauliffe - 2015 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 51 (3):300-319.
The a Priority of Abduction.Stephen Biggs & Jessica M. Wilson - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (3):735-758.
Ampliative Abduction.James Blachowicz - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (2):141 – 157.
Abduction as a Logic and Methodology of Discovery: The Importance of Strategies. [REVIEW]Sami Paavola - 2004 - Foundations of Science 9 (3):267-283.
Advice on Abductive Logic.Dov Gabbay & John Woods - 2006 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 14 (2):189-219.
Peirce-Suit of Truth – Why Inference to the Best Explanation and Abduction Ought Not to Be Confused.Minnameier Gerhard - 2004 - Erkenntnis 60 (1):75-105.
Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research by Iddo Tavory, Stefan Timmermans.Niiniluoto Ilkka - 2017 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 53 (1):152-154.
References found in this work
Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 1991 - London and New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton, Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work
Schemes, Critical Questions, and Complete Argument Evaluation.Shiyang Yu & Frank Zenker - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (4):469-498.
An Argumentative Reconstruction of the Computer Metaphor of the Brain.Andreas Bilstrup Finsen, Gerard J. Steen & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2019 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 8 (3):317-335.
Abduction: Some Conceptual Issues.Mariusz Urbański & Andrzej Klawiter - 2018 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 27 (4):583.
Abduction and Comparative Weighing of Explanatory Hypotheses: An Argumentative Approach.Paula Olmos - forthcoming - Logic Journal of the IGPL.
How Do Scientists Criticize the Computer Metaphor of the Brain?Andreas Bilstrup Finsen, Gerard J. Steen & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2021 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 10 (2):171-201.