Uniform Exceptions and Rights Violations

Social Theory and Practice 36 (1):44-77 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Non-uniformed combat morally infringes on civilians’ fundamental right to immunity and exacts an impermissible form of unofficial conscription that is morally prohibited even if the civilians knowingly consent to it. It is often argued that revolutionary groups burdened by resource disparities relative to the state or who claim alternative sources of political legitimacy (such as national self-determination or the constitution of a political collective) are justified in using unconventional tactics such as non-uniformed combat. Neither those reasons nor the provision of public goods, however, are sufficient to justify such rights violations and this form of conscription, and it calls into question the suitability of current international legal protections for the non-uniformed.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-03-06

Downloads
2,350 (#2,025)

6 months
179 (#3,227)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Yvonne Chiu
U.S. Naval War College

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the moral equality of combatants.Jeff McMahan - 2006 - Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (4):377–393.
Self-Ownership and the Limits of Libertarianism.Robert S. Taylor - 2005 - Social Theory and Practice 31 (4):465-482.

Add more references