Why do we need to define ‘art’ ? Because it greatly enhances the encounter with art itself

Alldaynight.Info (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Modern art has yet to be properly explained and given its own distinctive and authentic philosophy. It is almost always portrayed – openly or subliminally – as if it were somehow striving for much the same objectives as classical art, though perhaps by very different means. This has the effect of making modern artworks look slightly ridiculous in comparison with the grandeur of their classical counterparts, at the same time as making it an uphill struggle to try to argue the case for their supposed value.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Il metodo mitico ei cattivi pensieri.Elio Franzini - 2012 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 5 (1).
What Is an Antique?Benjamin L. Curtis & Darrin Baines - 2016 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (1):75-86.
The Garden as an Art.Mara Miller - 1993 - State University of New York Press.
The Intentional-Attributive Definition of Art.Alex Aliyev - 2009 - Consciousness, Literature and the Arts 10 (2).
The neglected programme of aesthetics.Steffen W. Gross - 2002 - British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (4):403-414.
Esthetics contemporary.Richard Kostelanetz (ed.) - 1978 - Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.
On Davies' institutional definition of art.Graham Oppy - 1991 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (3):371-382.
Politics of Beauty.Ken-Ichi Sasaki - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Research 37 (9999):55-60.
On the Definition of “Religion”.Phillip E. Devine - 1986 - Faith and Philosophy 3 (3):270-284.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-02

Downloads
2,165 (#3,866)

6 months
273 (#7,832)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?