Fool me once: Can indifference vindicate induction?

Episteme 15 (2):202-208 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Roger White (2015) sketches an ingenious new solution to the problem of induction. He argues from the principle of indifference for the conclusion that the world is more likely to be induction- friendly than induction-unfriendly. But there is reason to be skeptical about the proposed indifference-based vindication of induction. It can be shown that, in the crucial test cases White concentrates on, the assumption of indifference renders induction no more accurate than random guessing. After discussing this result, the paper explains why the indifference-based argument seemed so compelling, despite ultimately being unsound.

Similar books and articles

The Principle of Indifference and Inductive Scepticism.Robert Smithson - 2017 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (1):253-272.
Explanationist aid for the theory of inductive logic.Michael Huemer - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):345-375.
Reason and Prediction.Simon Blackburn - 1973 - London: Cambridge University Press.
Accuracy, Risk, and the Principle of Indifference.Richard G. Pettigrew - 2016 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92 (1):35-59.
Justification of Induction: Russell and Jin Yuelin. A Comparative Study.Chen Bo - 2012 - History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (4):353-378.
No Need to Justify Induction Generally.Kazuyoshi Kamiyama - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:105-111.
Induction, indifference and guessing.F. John Clendinnen - 1986 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 (3):340 – 344.


Added to PP

577 (#16,948)

6 months
82 (#12,395)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Zach Barnett
National University of Singapore
Han Li
Rutgers University - Camden

References found in this work

The problem of the problem of induction.Roger White - 2015 - Episteme 12 (2):275-290.

Add more references