Ethics and International Affairs 14 (1):119–123 (2000)
It is true that international institutions do not command the primary loyalty among the peoples of the world that would allow them the opportunity to legislate in favor of social justice. They do, however, command strong political backing from the most important political actors in world politics — namely, states. In addition, virtually all international organizations integrate nongovernmental organizations into their deliberative processes. Present globalization trends are increasing economic disparities between and within countries, but most regimes do provide poorer states with special provisions that can be used to protect their economic interests. Also, some have clearly benefited from economic openness. In the long term, it will be surprising if states do not address the problem of growing economic gaps through international regimes, although the likely adequacy of their responses is open to question
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rethinking International Organization: Deregulation and Global Governance.Barbara Emadi-Coffin - 2002 - Routledge.
Priority for Compatriots: Commentary on Globalization and Justice.Kok-Chor Tan - 2006 - Economics and Philosophy 22 (1):115-123.
Priority for Compatriots: Commentary on Globalization and Justice.T. A. N. Kok-Chor - 2006 - Economics and Philosophy 22 (1):115-123.
Globalization: Waiting — In Vain — For the New Long Boom.Robert Went - 2005 - Science and Society 69 (3):367 - 395.
Can Economic Globalization Lead to a More Just Society?Farhad Rassekh & John Speir - 2010 - Journal of Global Ethics 6 (1):27-43.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #693,803 of 2,163,972 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,100 of 2,163,972 )
How can I increase my downloads?