Authors
Peter Zachar
Auburn University Montgomery
Michael Schwartz
Texas A&M University
Abstract
In face of the multiple controversies surrounding the DSM process in general and the development of DSM-5 in particular, we have organized a discussion around what we consider six essential questions in further work on the DSM. The six questions involve: 1) the nature of a mental disorder; 2) the definition of mental disorder; 3) the issue of whether, in the current state of psychiatric science, DSM-5 should assume a cautious, conservative posture or an assertive, transformative posture; 4) the role of pragmatic considerations in the construction of DSM-5; 5) the issue of utility of the DSM – whether DSM-III and IV have been designed more for clinicians or researchers, and how this conflict should be dealt with in the new manual; and 6) the possibility and advisability, given all the problems with DSM-III and IV, of designing a different diagnostic system. Part 1 of this article took up the first two questions. Part 2 took up the second two questions. Part 3 now deals with Questions 5 & 6. Question 5 confronts the issue of utility, whether the manual design of DSM-III and IV favors clinicians or researchers, and what that means for DSM-5. Our final question, Question 6, takes up a concluding issue, whether the acknowledged problems with the earlier DSMs warrants a significant overhaul of DSM-5 and future manuals. As in Parts 1 & 2 of this article, the general introduction, as well as the introductions and conclusions for the specific questions, are written by James Phillips, and the responses to commentaries are written by Allen Frances.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1186/1747-5341-7-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,645
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Psychiatric Diagnosis: The Indispensability of Ambivalence.Felicity Callard - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (8):526-530.
Phenomenological Psychopathology and Psychiatric Classification.Anthony Vincent Fernandez - forthcoming - In Giovanni Stanghellini, Matthew Broome, Anthony Vincent Fernandez, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Andrea Raballo & René Rosfort (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Phenomenological Psychopathology. Oxford, UK: pp. 1016-1030.
The Name Game: Toward a Sociology of Diagnosis.Phil Brown - 1990 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 11 (3-4):385-406.
Pink and Blue: The Role of Gender in Psychiatric Diagnosis.George Gillett - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (4):271-274.
Values and Psychiatric Diagnosis.John Z. Sadler - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Saving the Explananda.Georg Repnikov - 2017 - In Kenneth S. Kendler & Joseph Parnas (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry IV: Psychiatric Nosology. Oxford, UK: pp. 274-281.
Toward A Concept of Instrumental Validity: Implications for Psychiatric Diagnosis.Ronald Pies - 2011 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 4 (1):18-19.
Is There Androcentric Bias in Psychiatric Diagnosis?Sue V. Rosser - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (2):215-231.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-06-02

Total views
83 ( #114,631 of 2,349,149 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #186,904 of 2,349,149 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes