Human Studies 26 (1):41-66 (2003)
AbstractThis article reexamines the rational choice or economic approach to human studies. Its adherents claim that its extension beyond its original domain to all human behavior can finally lead to integration of the human studies, especially social theory, and thus their elevation from what they see as a chaotic state. Specifically, they propose grounding human studies on the premise that humans are rational egoists or self-interested utility maximizers. Although this premise has been the conceptual foundation of orthodox economic theory, it has been questioned, and even in part discredited in its heterodox versions. This reexamination casts serious doubts on such claims.
Similar books and articles
Against Reductionist Explanations of Human Behaviour: John Dupré.John Dupré - 1998 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):153–172.
Rational Choice Theory and Economic Laws: The Role of Shared Values.Amparo Gómez Rodríguez - 2008 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):191-205.
Living with Reason.Ross Poole - 1992 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 35 (2):199 – 217.
Battering RAMs.Michael Taylor - 1995 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 9 (1-2):223-234.
What Rational Choice Explains.Robert E. Lane - 1995 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 9 (1-2):107-126.
The Contribution of Rational Choice Theory to Macrosociological Research.Debra Friedman & Michael Hechter - 1988 - Sociological Theory 6 (2):201-218.
The Promise and Limitations of Rational Choice Theory.Stanley Kelley - 1995 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 9 (1-2):95-106.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Sacrificial Agape and Group Selection in Contemporary American Christianity.J. Jeffrey Tillman - 2008 - Zygon 43 (3):541-556.