Posthuman in a secret s/p(l)ace

Вісник Харківського Національного Університету Імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія «Філософія. Філософські Перипетії» 63:8-16 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article posthumanistic aspects of the problem of secret s/pace, i. e. both spaces and place were researched. Differentiation of a space and a place, a secret and a mystery was made. A manifold of a conception of secrecy from a tendency to keep a secret of s/pace carefully to claim to demystify a place completely is investigated. Philosophy, philosophical anthropology especially, appears as geophilosophy, human geography in this case. Thus a conceptualizing human being is surveying in a friendship with a landscape, s/pace. The importance of natural elements for secret s/pace has been demonstrated. Of particular actuality to this study is the appeal to the current concept of the atmosphere, which is weakly perceptible, but is influential. The relationship between a secret s/pace and a secret self, such as a freak, Secret Santa, etc., was traced. A distinction is made between a secret s/pace and a non-place like moving place with a discourse, place of surveying. The importance of a secret s/pace for the formation of a post-body in a situation where the body as such is lost is shown. The importance of psychoanalytic and psychogeographic conceptualization of a secret s/pace is also demonstrated. They are adjoined by the consideration of space concerning boredom as stabilization of pleasure in the habitual and comfortable, good banality, a bliss from the side of pleasure. The significance of the secret s/pace is asserted in conditions when the city plays not only a conjunctive, connecting, but also a disjunctive, disconnecting role. A conclusion is made about a secret s/pace as a posthuman place of a place, a place-without-place with a secret of mystery. The study was carried out on the material of actual culture, as well as life practices. This corresponds to the Deleuzian statement about the intersection of concept, prospectus and affect. The study also involved speculative realism, speculative posthumanism, and other related conceptions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Logic of the Secret in Hegel and Derrida.Nahum Brown - 2019 - Philosophy and Theology 31 (1):39-58.
Pulcinella secrets.Emilio Mordini - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (9):ii-iii.
Le Secret.Philippe Dujardin - 1987 - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
Secret law and the value of publicity.Christopher Kutz - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (2):197-217.
Berkeley and the Tattletale’s Paradox.H. E. Baber - 1989 - Idealistic Studies 19 (1):79-82.
LE COMPLOT- Serment et secret.Kiraly V. Istvan - 1992 - Politica Hermetica 6.
The Secret of Theory.Claire Colebrook - 2010 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 4 (3):287-300.
Life – Death – Secret – Terrorism.Kiraly V. Istvan - 2008 - Philobiblon - Transylvanian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research in Humanities 13.
Secret Law Revisited.Benjamin L. S. Nelson - 2019 - Ratio Juris 32 (4):473-486.
Library Secret Fonds and the Competition of Societies.Istvan Kiraly - 2001 - Libraries and Culture 36 (1):185-192.
The secret according to Heidegger and “The Purloined Letter” by Poe.Rudolf Bernet - 2014 - Continental Philosophy Review 47 (3-4):353-371.
Story of a Secret Society.Marina Galletti - 2018 - Theory, Culture and Society 35 (4-5):135-154.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-30

Downloads
20 (#740,497)

6 months
11 (#220,905)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references