Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (II)

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):223-262 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,813

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
189 (#107,351)

6 months
11 (#270,674)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Rationality of Science.W. Newton-Smith - 1981 - Boston: Routledge.
Why the ultimate argument for scientific realism ultimately fails.Moti Mizrahi - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):132-138.
Logical versus historical theories of confirmation.Alan Musgrave - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):1-23.
Science, metaphysics and method.James Ladyman - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (1):31-51.

View all 87 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Personal knowledge.Michael Polanyi - 1958 - Chicago,: University of Chicago Press.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.
Personal Knowledge.Michael Polanyi - 1958 - Chicago,: Routledge.
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.Imre Lakatos - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 91-196.
Autobiographical Notes.Max Black, Albert Einstein & Paul Arthur Schilpp - 1949 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (2):157.

View all 31 references / Add more references