NanoEthics 14 (2):155-167 (2020)
Abstract |
Nanotechnology has revolutionized various industries and has become a notable catalyst for economic growth. The emerging issues of human health and safety associated with nanotechnology development have raised regulatory concerns worldwide. In occupational settings, the same novel characteristics of nanomaterials that are utilized for innovation may also be the source of toxins with adverse health effects for workers. The existing regulatory framework may function effectively to regulate chemical substances in their conventional forms but may not be adequate with regard to the specific issues of nanoform substances. A foundation of knowledge concerning properties of nanomaterials, and risk management approaches for these materials have been established, but conclusive results remain elusive. It is difficult for lawmakers to regulate nanotechnology-related activities effectively if conventional regulatory mechanisms are applied. The present article analyses in a country study the adequacy of existing Malaysian occupational safety and health law with regard to the specific issues presented by nanotechnology. The applicable regulatory approaches are examined to justify the adoption of soft law instruments as regulatory mechanisms for nanotechnology. A number of soft law best practices are briefly discussed as a basis to recommend practical solutions to close the existing regulatory gap.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s11569-020-00363-7 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Meta-Regulation and Nanotechnologies: The Challenge of Responsibilisation Within the European Commission’s Code of Conduct for Responsible Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies Research. [REVIEW]Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung & Clare Shelley-Egan - 2013 - NanoEthics 7 (1):55-68.
Changing Me Softly: Making Sense of Soft Regulation and Compliance in the Italian Nanotechnology Sector.Simone Arnaldi - 2017 - NanoEthics 11 (1):3-16.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Decision Support for International Agreements Regulating Nanomaterials.Ineke Malsch, Martin Mullins, Elena Semenzin, Alex Zabeo, Danail Hristozov & Antonio Marcomini - 2018 - NanoEthics 12 (1):39-54.
Discovering Specific Conditions for Compliance with Soft Regulation Related to Work with Nanomaterials.Aline Reichow & Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung - 2013 - NanoEthics 7 (1):83-92.
Conceptual Questions and Challenges Associated with the Traditional Risk Assessment Paradigm for Nanomaterials.Jutta Jahnel - 2015 - NanoEthics 9 (3):261-276.
Integrated Modeling, Simulation, and Visualization for Nanomaterials.Feiwei Qin, Haibin Xia, Yong Peng & Zizhao Wu - 2018 - Complexity 2018:1-16.
Nanomaterials and Effects on Biological Systems: Development of Effective Regulatory Norms. [REVIEW]Padmavati Manchikanti & Tapas K. Bandopadhyay - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (1):77-83.
New Zealand’s Regulation of Cosmetic Products Containing Nanomaterials.Jennifer Moore - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (2):185-188.
The European and Member States' Approaches to Regulating Nanomaterials: Two Levels of Governance.Aida Maria Ponce Del Castillo - 2013 - NanoEthics 7 (3):189-199.
Scientists’ Understandings of Risk of Nanomaterials: Disciplinary Culture Through the Ethnographic Lens.Mikael Johansson & Åsa Boholm - 2017 - NanoEthics 11 (3):229-242.
Nanotoxicology and Ethical Conditions for Informed Consent.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (1):47-56.
Handling Worker and Third-Party Exposures to Nanotherapeutics During Clinical Trials.Gurumurthy Ramachandran, John Howard, Andrew Maynard & Martin Philbert - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):856-864.
Risk Calculation as Experience and Action—Assessing and Managing the Risks and Opportunities of Nanomaterials.Christian Büscher - 2015 - NanoEthics 9 (3):277-295.
Soft Ordered Semigroups.Young Bae Jun, Kyoung Ja Lee & Asghar Khan - 2010 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 56 (1):42-50.
Varieties of Risk Representations.John Kadvany - 1997 - Journal of Social Philosophy 28 (3):123-143.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-03-25
Total views
3 ( #1,278,179 of 2,401,777 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #361,744 of 2,401,777 )
2020-03-25
Total views
3 ( #1,278,179 of 2,401,777 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #361,744 of 2,401,777 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads