Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (3):331-350 (2006)

Authors
Leo Zaibert
Union College
Abstract
Punishment is punishment even if it is not (perceived by the punisher to be) deserved. But punishment which is not (perceived by the punisher to be) fitting is not punishment. This paper explores the differences between desert and fittingness, and argues that incorporating fittingness into thedefinition of punishment is not problematic, whereas incorporating desert in such definition is, in contrast, infamously problematic. The main difference between these two notions turns on the interesting differences between two types of normativity. Fittingness is exclusively concerned with aesthetic normativity, whereas desert is more directly concerned with moral normativity. When something is fitting, then it is, to an extent, intrinsically good, and, to an extent, it is also beautiful. The notion of fittingness has largely been ignored in discussions of punishment, yet it helps us better to understand the phenomenon of punishment, and in particular the thorny relationship between this phenomenon and desert. Key Words: beauty • desert • fittingness • normativity • punishment • retributivism.
Keywords beauty   normativity   retributivism   punishment   desert   fittingness
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1740468106071229
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,740
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Concept of Desert.John Kleinig - 1971 - American Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1):71 - 78.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Moral Responsibility and Merit.Matt King - 2012 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 6 (2):1-18.
Two Faces of Desert.Matt King - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (3):401-424.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Moral Desert: A Critique.Howard Simmons - 2010 - University Press of America.
Retributivist Arguments Against Capital Punishment.Thom Brooks - 2004 - Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (2):188–197.
Giving Capitalists Their Due.Stephen Kershnar - 2005 - Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):65-87.
Deserved Punishment.J. L. A. Garcia - 1989 - Law and Philosophy 8 (2):263 - 277.
Objections to the Systematic Imposition of Punitive Torture.Stephen Kershnar - 1999 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (1):47-56.
Moral Responsibility and Merit.Matt King - 2012 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 6 (2):1-18.
Persons, Punishment, and Free Will Skepticism.Benjamin Vilhauer - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (2):143-163.
Making Sense of Retributivism.J. Angelo Corlett - 2001 - Philosophy 76 (1):77-110.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
90 ( #107,647 of 2,386,859 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #202,295 of 2,386,859 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes