The Instruments of Abolition, or Why Retributivism is the Only Real Justification of Punishment

Law and Philosophy 32 (1):33-58 (2013)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10982-012-9156-z
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,820
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Retributivism Revisited.Nathan Hanna - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):473-484.
Retributivism In Extremis.Douglas Husak - 2013 - Law and Philosophy 32 (1):3-31.
Reciprocity as a Justification for Retributivism.L. Anderson Jami - 1997 - Criminal Justice Ethics 16 (1):13-25.
The Failure of Trust-Based Retributivism.Daniel Z. Korman - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (6):561-575.
Punishment as Penalty.Suzanne Uniacke - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (1):37-47.
Making Sense of Retributivism.J. Angelo Corlett - 2001 - Philosophy 76 (1):77-110.
Guit, Anger, and Retribution.Raffaele Rodogno - 2010 - Legal Theory 16 (1):59-76.
Retributivism and Fallible Systems of Punishment.George Schedler - 2011 - Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (3):240-266.
Unintentional Punishment.Adam Kolber - 2012 - Legal Theory 18 (1):1-29.
Added to PP index
2012-10-02

Total downloads
20 ( #270,929 of 2,210,224 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #223,929 of 2,210,224 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature