Disgrace: The Lies of the Patriarch

Social Research: An International Quarterly 75 (4):1035-1058 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Fraudulent behavior was not unfamiliar to any of Israel’s patriarchs. Despite this, the Bible’s historiography nonetheless gives voice to two contradicting tendencies. The first aims to teach that, for every transgression that is committed, God will punish the transgressor; the other, in tension with the first, tries to lessen a figure’s guilt by finding extenuating circumstances. This paper focuses on Israel’s patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, who serve as national archetypes. From among the patriarchs’ sins, we will examine only the most prominent, acts of lies, deception, and fraudulence, and we will consider whether the deceivers were commensurately punished and whether any effort was made to justify them

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The patriarch hypothesis.Frank Marlowe - 2000 - Human Nature 11 (1):27-42.
Rape and Silence in J.M. Coetzee's Disgrace.Graham St John Stott - 2009 - Philosophical Papers 38 (3):347-362.
Disgrace.Christopher Shea - forthcoming - Journal of Information Ethics.
The Patriarch as Reviewer.N. C. Wilson - 1979 - The Classical Review 29 (02):217-.
Disgrace : Bernard Williams and J.M. Coetzee.Catherine Wilson - 2008 - In Garry Hagberg (ed.), Art and Ethical Criticism. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 144--162.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-29

Downloads
51 (#303,466)

6 months
2 (#1,244,653)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references