Parsimony and the triple-system model of concepts

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):230-231 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Machery's dismissive position on parsimony requires that we examine especially carefully the data he provides as evidence for his complex triple-system account. We use the prototype-exemplar debate as an example of empirical findings which may not, in fact, support a multiple-systems account. We discuss the importance of considering complexity in scientific theory

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,420

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dynamic brain systems in Quest for emotional homeostasis.Jack van Honk & J. L. G. Schutter - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):220-221.
Feedback consistency effects.Johannes C. Ziegler & Guy C. Van Orden - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):351-352.
Models of complexity: The example of emotions.Catherine Belzung & Catherine Chevalley - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1053-1054.
Embodiment and complex systems.Giorgio Metta & Giulio Sandini - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1068-1069.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
53 (#296,706)

6 months
17 (#204,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joe Cruz
Williams College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references