British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (3):395 - 418 (2011)
In this work I argue that Descartes was not a trialist by showing that the main tenets of trialist interpretations of Descartes's theory of substance are either not supported by the text or are not sufficient for establishing the trialist interpretation
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Descartes's Theory of Distinction.Paul Hoffman - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):57-78.
Citations of this work BETA
Cottingam’s Conception of Descrates’s Trialism and Modern Discussions.Lubov Bodnarchuk & Anastasia Sen’ - 2014 - Sententiae 30 (1):196-209.
Similar books and articles
Descartes on Composites, Incomplete Substances, and Kinds of Unity.Dan Kaufman - 2008 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 90 (1):39-73.
Descartes's Substance Dualism and His Independence Conception of Substance.Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (1):69-89.
Minds, Substances, and Capacities.Charles Sayward - 1983 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44 (2):213-225.
Comments on Daniel Garber's Leibniz: Body, Substance Monad for the Eastern.Jeffrey McDonough - unknown
Descartes and Leibniz on the Concept of Substance and the Possibility of Metaphysics.Corey W. Dyck - 2005 - In Descartes and Cartesianism.
Descartes and Berkeley on Mind: The Fourth Distinction.Walter Ott - 2006 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (3):437 – 450.
The Identity Theory.David M. Rosenthal - 1994 - In Samuel D. Guttenplan (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell.
Added to index2011-05-26
Total downloads54 ( #94,213 of 2,152,003 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #185,176 of 2,152,003 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.