On mally's alleged heresy: A reply

History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (1):59-68 (1992)
In this paper, I respond to D. Jacquette's paper, "Mally's Heresy and the Logic of Meinong's Object Theory" (History and Philosophy of Logic, 10 (1989): 1-14), in which it is claimed that Ernst Mally's distinction between two modes of predication, as it is employed in the theory of abstract objects, is reducible to, and analyzable in terms of, a single mode of predication plus the distinction between nuclear and extranuclear properties. The argument against Jacquette's claims consists of counterexamples to his reductions and analyses. Reasons are offered for thinking that no such reduction/analysis of the kind Jacquette proposes could be successful.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/01445349208837194
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,463
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Seyed N. Mousavian (2010). Neo-Meinongian neo-Russellians. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (2):229-259.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

48 ( #101,494 of 1,925,541 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #308,489 of 1,925,541 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.