Conclusion

In Ethics and the Beast: A Speciesist Argument for Animal Liberation. Princeton University Press. pp. 135-136 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two types of multiple-conclusion systems.A. Avron - 1998 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 6 (5):695-718.
In defence of repugnance.Michael Huemer - 2008 - Mind 117 (468):899-933.
Probability and scepticism.Brian Weatherson - 2014 - In Dylan Dodd Elia Zardini (ed.), Scepticism and Perceptual Justification. Oxford University Press. pp. 71-86.
Faith and the Existence of God.R. G. Swinburne - 1988 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 24:121-143.
The Very Repugnant Conclusion.Gustaf Arrhenius - 2003 - In Krister Segerberg & Ryszard Sliwinski (eds.), Logic, Law, Morality: Thirteen Essays in Practical Philosophy in Honour of Lennart Åqvist. Department of Philosophy, Uppsala University. pp. 29-44.
Some multi-conclusion modal paralogics.Casey McGinnis - 2007 - Logica Universalis 1 (2):335-353.
Negative Average Preference Utilitarianism.Roger Chao - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy of Life 2 (1):55-66.
Logical Consequence.J. C. Beall, Greg Restall & Gil Sagi - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
2 (#1,634,744)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references