Princeton University Press (2011)

Abstract
Hamlet tells Horatio that there are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in his philosophy. In Double Vision, philosopher and literary critic Tzachi Zamir argues that there are more things in Hamlet than are dreamt of--or at least conceded--by most philosophers. Making an original and persuasive case for the philosophical value of literature, Zamir suggests that certain important philosophical insights can be gained only through literature. But such insights cannot be reached if literature is deployed merely as an aesthetic sugaring of a conceptual pill. Philosophical knowledge is not opposed to, but is consonant with, the literariness of literature. By focusing on the experience of reading literature as literature and not philosophy, Zamir sets a theoretical framework for a philosophically oriented literary criticism that will appeal both to philosophers and literary critics. Double Vision is concerned with the philosophical understanding induced by the aesthetic experience of literature. Literary works can function as credible philosophical arguments--not ones in which claims are conclusively demonstrated, but in which claims are made plausible. Such claims, Zamir argues, are embedded within an experiential structure that is itself a crucial dimension of knowing. Developing an account of literature's relation to knowledge, morality, and rhetoric, and advancing philosophical-literary readings of Richard III, Macbeth, Romeo and Juliet, Othello, Antony and Cleopatra, Hamlet, and King Lear, Zamir shows how his approach can open up familiar texts in surprising and rewarding ways
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2012
Buy this book $20.18 used (33% off)   $28.02 new (6% off)   $29.95 from Amazon    Amazon page
ISBN(s) 9780691155456   9781400827435   0691155453
DOI 10.1515/9781400827435
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,920
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
Chapters BETA

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Narrative Representation and Phenomenological Knowledge.Rafe McGregor - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (2):327-342.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Double Vision: Moral Philosophy and Shakespearean Drama by Zamir, Tzachi.Stephanie Patridge - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (2):208–210.
Theorising Drama as Moral Education.Joe Winston - 1999 - Journal of Moral Education 28 (4):459-471.
Reid's Response to Hume on Double Vision.James J. S. Foster - 2008 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (2):189-194.
Reid on Single and Double Vision: Mechanics and Morals.James van Cleve - 2008 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (1):1-20.
The Picture of Dorian Gray.Paul Edwards - 1992 - L.A. Theatre Works.
Who is Entitled to Double Effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
Reading Drama.Tzachi Zamir - 2012 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (2):179-192.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-09

Total views
15 ( #663,631 of 2,439,308 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #434,168 of 2,439,308 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes