Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):71-81 (2008)
AbstractIn this paper I want to present the guiding lines of a research programme into the economics of scientific knowledge, a programme whose ultimate goal is to develop what I would like to call a contractarian epistemology. The structure of the paper is as follows: in the first section I will comment on two conflicting approaches to the topic of rationality in science: the view of the rationality of scientific knowledge as deriving from the employment of sound methodological norms, and the view of scientists as rational agents pursuing the optimisation of their own personal and professional interests. In section 2 I will try to make both approaches mutually consistent by showing that a competition among rational "recognition-seekers" is only possible if they agree in accepting some system of methodological norms. Section 3 will be devoted to analyse the main kinds and properties of these norms. Finally, in section 4 I will discuss a question which is far from being easy and innocent: why are scientific norms obeyed by researchers, once they have been established in a scientific discipline?
Similar books and articles
Cooperation, Competition, and the Contractarian View of Scientific Research.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - unknown
Beyond Conflict of Interest: The Responsible Conduct of Research.Lawrence J. Rhoades - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):459-468.
Financial Conflicts of Interest and Criteria for Research Credibility.Kevin C. Elliott - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S5):917-937.
Science, Normativity and the Public.David Teira & Jesus Zamora Bonilla - 2007 - Social epistemology. 21.1 21 (1):1-81.
The Philosophy of Scientific Practice in Naturalist Thought: Its Approaches and Problems. [REVIEW]Xiaofei Tian & Tong Wu - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (4):589-603.
Editors' Introduction: Science, Normativity and the Public.David Teira Serrano & Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2007 - Social Epistemology 21 (1):1 – 4.
Individual and Institutional Conflict of Interest: Policy Review by Research Universities in the United States.Nils Hasselmo - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):421-427.
Barking Up the Wrong Tree? Industry Funding of Academic Research: A Case Study with Commentaries.Brian Schrag, Gloria Ferrell, Vivian Weil, Tristan J. Fiedler, Gloria Ferrell, Vivian Weil & Tristan J. Fiedler - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):569-582.
Science as a Persuasion Game: An Inferentialist Approach.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2006 - Episteme 2 (3):189-201.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads