Truthlikeness, Rationality and Scientific Method

Synthese 122 (3):321-335 (2000)
Abstract
I. A. Kieseppä's criticism of the methodological use of the theory of verisimilitude, and D. B. Resnik's arguments against the explanation of scientific method by appeal to scientific aims are critically considered. Since the notion of verisimilitude was introduced as an attempt to show that science can be seen as a rational enterprise in the pursuit of truth, defenders of the verisimilitude programme need to show that scientific norms can be interpreted as rules that try to increase the degree of truthlikeness of scientific theories. This possibility is explored for several approaches to the problem of verisimilitude
Keywords Philosophy   Philosophy   Epistemology   Logic   Metaphysics   Philosophy of Language
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1005269826141
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,113
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Science: The Rules of the Game.Jesús Zamora-Bonilla - 2010 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 18 (2):294-307.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
175 ( #35,834 of 2,313,600 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #392,244 of 2,313,600 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature