Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57 (3):315-332 (1999)
D0 works 0f an essentially involve a relation t0 an audience'? Many otherwise very different theories of art agree than they do. S0 the question ‘Wha1 is art?" has no be answered by describing than relation. I shall argue 10 the ccmmrary [hm a theory of wha; ir is m be art should nm invoke any relacicm m an audience. Art has nothing esscmial to do with an audience.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Against Value Empiricism in Aesthetics.James Shelley - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):707-720.
Beauty, the Social Network.Dominic McIver Lopes - 2017 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (4):437-453.
Similar books and articles
Are There Counterexamples to Aesthetic Theories of Art?Nick Zangwill - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):111–118.
Classical Music Why Bother?: Hearing the World of Contemporary Culture Through a Composer's Ears.Joshua Fineberg - 2006 - Routledge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads176 ( #25,942 of 2,172,025 )
Recent downloads (6 months)62 ( #3,002 of 2,172,025 )
How can I increase my downloads?