The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2003)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Beauty is an important part of our lives. Ugliness too. It is no surprise then that philosophers since antiquity have been interested in our experiences of and judgments about beauty and ugliness. They have tried to understand the nature of these experiences and judgments, and they have also wanted to know whether these experiences and judgments were legitimate. Both these projects took a sharpened form in the twentieth century, when this part of our lives came under a sustained attack in both European and American intellectual circles. Much of the discourse about beauty since the Eighteenth century had deployed a notion of the ‘aesthetic’, and so that notion in particular came in for criticism. This disdain for the aesthetic may have roots in a broader cultural Puritanism, which fears the connection between the aesthetic and pleasure. Even to suggest, in the recent climate, that an artwork might be good because it is pleasurable, as opposed to cognitively, morally or politically beneficial, is to court derision. The twentieth century has not been kind to the notions of beauty or the aesthetic. Nevertheless, some thinkers — philosophers, as well as others in the study of particular arts — have persisted in thinking about beauty and the aesthetic in a traditional way. In the first part of this essay, I look at the particular rich account of judgments of beauty given to us by Immanuel Kant. The notion of a ‘judgment of taste’ is central to Kant's account and also to virtually everyone working in traditional aesthetics; so I begin by examining Kant's characterisation of the judgment of taste. In the second part, I look at the issues that twentieth century thinkers have raised. I end by drawing on Kant's accout of the judgement of taste to consider whether the notion of the aesthetic is viable.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Beyond Appearances : The Content of Sensation and Perception.Jesse J. Prinz - 2006 - In Tamar Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Perceptual Experience. Oxford University Press. pp. 434--460.
Citations of this work BETA
Morality and Aesthetics of Food.Shen-yi Liao & Aaron Meskin - 2018 - In Anne Barnhill, Mark Budolfson & Tyler Doggett (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on Food Ethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 658-679.
The Aesthetics of Theory Selection and the Logics of Art.Ian O’Loughlin & Kate McCallum - 2018 - Philosophy of Science (2):325-343.
The Moral Status of Nature : Reasons to Care for the Natural World.Lars Samuelsson - 2008 - Dissertation,
Beauty in Science: A New Model of the Role of Aesthetic Evaluations in Science. [REVIEW]Ulianov Montano - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3 (2):133-156.
View all 11 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Aesthetic Judging and the Intentionality of Pleasure.Hannah Ginsborg - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):164 – 181.
Critical Aesthetic Realism.Jennifer A. McMahon - 2011 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (2):49-69.
Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience?Rolf Reber, Norbert Schwarz & Piotr Winkielman - 2004 - Personality and Social Psychology Review 8 (4):364-382.
Beauty.Nick Zangwill - 2003 - In Jerrold Levinson (ed.), Oxford Companion to Aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
Beauty as an Encounter Between Freedom and Nature: A Romantic Interpretation of Kant's Critique of Judgment.María Rosario Acosta Lópedelz - 2007 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (1):63-92.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
82 ( #121,556 of 2,409,938 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #541,494 of 2,409,938 )
2009-01-28
Total views
82 ( #121,556 of 2,409,938 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #541,494 of 2,409,938 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads