Jurysprudencyjny model argumentacji: S.E. Toulmin

Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 42 (2):201-222 (2002)

Authors
Tomasz Zarębski
University of Lower Silesia
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,013
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Respondeo: Method and Content in Casuistry.Kevin Wm Wildes - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):115-119.
Stephen Edelston Toulmin (1922–2009).Tomasz Zarębski - 2010 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia:15-26.
O argumentacji odwołującej się do implikatury konwersacyjnej.Tomasz Puczyłowski - 2012 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 83 (3):93-109.
The Uses of Argument in Mathematics.Andrew Aberdein - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):287-301.
Toulmin on Ideals of Natural Order.Richard L. Purtill - 1971 - Synthese 22 (3-4):431 - 437.
Return to Reason.Stephen Edelston Toulmin - 2001 - Harvard University Press.
The Priesthood of Bioethics and the Return of Casuistry.Kevin Wm Wildes - 1993 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (1):33-49.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-03-15

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes