Informal Logic 29 (3):296-308 (2009)

Abstract
A strong argument culture is characterized by at least five productive tensions, between: commitment and contingency, partisanship and restraint, personal conviction and sensitivity to the audience, reasonableness and subjectivity, and decision and non-closure. Differences in how communities manage these tensions explain why there are multiple argument cultures and, hence, why we need to understand arguing both within and among different cultures. The paper elaborates these five productive tensions, offers some examples of argument cultures that negotiate them in various ways, and considers what it means to argue across cultures in a world that is both increasingly diverse and increasingly atomized
Keywords argument culture, audience, contingency, cooperative argument, decision making, justification, reasonableness, risk
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,919
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance.Peter Houtlosser, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation.Chaïm Perelman - 1969 - Notre Dame, [Ind.]University of Notre Dame Press.
The Uses of Argument.STEPHEN TOULMIN - 1958 - Philosophy 34 (130):244-245.
The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas.Thomas Mccarthy - 1978 - Human Studies 3 (2):175-184.
The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas.William E. Connolly - 1979 - History and Theory 18 (3):397.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Should Climate Scientists Fly?Jean Goodwin - 2020 - Informal Logic 40 (2):157-203.
Death Penalty for Down’s Syndrome.Piotr Lewinski - 2016 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 5 (2):172-190.
David Zarefsky . Political Argumentation in the United States.Gordon R. Mitchell - 2016 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 5 (2):222-225.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Argument to Love.Viktor Tchouechov - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 49:121-127.
Trudy Govier and Premise Adequacy.Derek Allen - 2013 - Informal Logic 33 (2):116-142.
Paley’s Argument for Design.Graham Oppy - 2002 - Philo 5 (2):161-173.
Sellars's Ethics: Variations on Kantian Themes.Paul Hurley - 2000 - Philosophical Studies 101 (2-3):291-324.
Some Sketchy Notes on the Reaper Argument.Vladimir Marko - 2012 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 19 (3):361-387.
Evidentialism and Skeptical Arguments.Dylan Dodd - 2012 - Synthese 189 (2):337-352.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-24

Total views
26 ( #381,255 of 2,343,510 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #515,031 of 2,343,510 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes