Oleg B. Zaslavskii. The little in a non-Euclidean world: On the artistic space in Tom Stoppard's film and play “Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead”. Abstract [Book Review]

Sign Systems Studies 33 (2):343-343 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,702

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are 'dead'?J. F. Catherwood - 1992 - Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (1):34-39.
Euclides ab omni naevo vindicatus.J. R. Lucas - 1969 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (1):1-11.
Stoppard’s Hapgood and the Drama of Politics and Science.Corey Abel - 2006 - Perspectives on Political Science 35 (3):143-148.
Five Papers on Logic and Foundations.G. S. Ceitin (ed.) - 1971 - Providence, R.I., American Mathematical Society.
From Night to Day: Nihilism and the Living Dead.John Marmysz - 1996 - Film & Philosophy (Society for the Philosophic Study of the Contemporary Visual Arts) 3:138-143.
After aura.Oleg Gelikman - 2003 - Angelaki 8 (1):43 – 60.
Euclidean Functions of Computable Euclidean Domains.Rodney G. Downey & Asher M. Kach - 2011 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (2):163-172.


Added to PP

21 (#558,174)

6 months
2 (#320,051)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references