Who Should Control a Corporation? Toward a Contingency Stakeholder Model for Allocating Ownership Rights
Journal of Business Ethics 103 (2):255-274 (2011)
A number of companies allocate ownership rights to stakeholders different from shareholders, despite the fact that the law attributes these rights to the equity holders. This article contributes to an understanding of this evidence by developing a contingency model for the allocation of ownership rights. The model sheds light on why companies, despite pressures from the law, vary in their allocation of ownership rights. The model is based on the assumption that corporations increase their chance to survive and prosper if the stakeholders supplying “critical contributions” receive the ownership rights. According to the model, “critical” contributions involve (1) contractual problems due to specific investments, long-term relationships, and low measurability; (2) the assumption of the uncertainty resting on the company; and (3) the supply of scarce and valuable resources. The model is dynamic because it also provides a basis for understanding why the allocation of ownership rights changes with time. Finally, the article presents the strategies companies can use to realize an efficient distribution of ownership rights among their stakeholders
|Keywords||corporate governance ownership rights shareholder theory stakeholder theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function.Michael C. Jensen - 2002 - Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (2):235-256.
Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis.Kenneth E. Goodpaster - 1991 - Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (1):53-73.
A Social Contract Account for CSR as an Extended Model of Corporate Governance (I): Rational Bargaining and Justification. [REVIEW]Lorenzo Sacconi - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 68 (3):259 - 281.
Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.Armen Alchian, Harold Demsetz, Kenneth Arrow, Richard Edwards, Herbert Gintis & Michael C. Jensen - 1983 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (4):354-368.
A Contingency Theory of Corporate Social Performance.Bryan W. Husted - 2000 - Business and Society 39 (1):24-48.
Citations of this work BETA
The Virtue of Participatory Governance: A MacIntyrean Alternative to Shareholder Maximization.Caleb Bernacchio & Robert Couch - 2015 - Business Ethics: A European Review 24 (S2):130-143.
Monitoring Intensity and Stakeholders' Orientation: How Does Governance Affect Social and Environmental Disclosure? [REVIEW]Christine Mallin, Giovanna Michelon & Davide Raggi - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 114 (1):29-43.
Deconstructing the Relationship Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance.Francesco Perrini, Angeloantonio Russo, Antonio Tencati & Clodia Vurro - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 102 (S1):59-76.
Assessing the Accountability of the Benefit Corporation: Will This New Gray Sector Organization Enhance Corporate Social Responsibility? [REVIEW]Rae André - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 110 (1):133-150.
Benchmarking Tendencies in Managerial Mindsets: Prioritizing Stockholders and Stakeholders in Peru, South Africa, and the United States.John A. Parnell, Gregory J. Scott & Georgios Angelopoulos - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 118 (3):589-605.
Similar books and articles
Self-Ownership.Peter Vallentyne - 2001 - In Laurence Becker & Charlotte Becker (eds.), Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd edition. Garland Publishing.
Man and Matter: How the Former Gains Ownership of the Latter.Per Bylund - 2012 - Libertarian Papers 4.
Does Employee Ownership Benefit Value Creation? The Case of France (2001–2005).Thierry Poulain-Rehm & Xavier Lepers - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 112 (2):325-340.
Mergers, Takeovers, and a Property Ethic.Vincent Norcia - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (1-2):109 - 116.
Intrinsic Limitations of Property Rights.J. M. Elegido - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (5):411 - 416.
Locke and Libertarian Property Rights: Reply to Weinberg.Am Feallsanach - 1998 - Critical Review 12 (3):319-323.
Employee Governance and the Ownership of the Firm.John R. Boatright - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (1):1-21.
The Author as Steward 'for Limited Times': A Review of 'the Idea of Authorship in Copyright'. [REVIEW]Roberta Rosenthal Kwall - manuscript
Ownership, Co-Ownership, and the Justification of Property Rights.J. E. Penner - 2006 - In J. W. Harris, Timothy Andrew Orville Endicott, Joshua Getzler & Edwin Peel (eds.), Properties of Law: Essays in Honour of Jim Harris. Oxford University Press.
Against Self-Ownership: There Are No Fact-Insensitive Ownership Rights Over One's Body.Kasper Lippert-rasmussen - 2008 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (1):86–118.
Who Owns My Avatar? -Rights in Virtual Property.Anders Eriksson & Kalle Grill - 2005 - Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 Conference: Changing Views – Worlds in Play.
Added to index2011-09-07
Total downloads25 ( #199,041 of 2,153,857 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,274 of 2,153,857 )
How can I increase my downloads?