Response latency as a function of the amount of reinforcement

Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (4):466 (1949)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0060477

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Retention and subsequent extinction of a simple running response following varying conditions of reinforcement.F. W. Finger - 1942 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 31 (2):120.
A quantitative investigation of the delay-of-reinforcement gradient.C. T. Perin - 1943 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 32 (1):37.
Drive level and reinforcement.James Deese & J. A. Carpenter - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 42 (4):236.
The effect of different amounts of reinforcement upon the acquisition and extinction of a simple running response.F. A. Mote - 1944 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 34 (3):216.
Response latency at zero drive after varying numbers of reinforcements.David Zeaman & Betty J. House - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (5):570.
Response force as a function of amount of reinforcement.Vincent Di Lollo, W. D. Ensminger & J. M. Notterman - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (1):27.
Effect of magnitude of reinforcement on acquisition and extinction of a running response.Harvard L. Armus - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (1):61.
Positive and negative partial-reinforcement extinction effects carried through continuous reinforcement, changed motivation, and changed response.Robert R. Ross - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (5):492.
The effect of reinforcement on closely following S-R connections: II. Effect of food reward immediately preceding performance of an instrumental conditioned response on extinction of that response.Mohamed O. Nagaty - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 42 (5):333.
Extinction by omission of food as related to partial and secondary reinforcement.Stewart H. Hulse Jr & Walter C. Stanley - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 52 (4):221.
Exploratory drive and secondary reinforcement in the acquisition and extinction of a simple running response.F. A. Mote & F. W. Finger - 1942 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 31 (1):57.
Extinction in a runway as a function of acquisition level and reinforcement percentage.Winfred F. Hill & Norman E. Spear - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (5):495.
Resistance to extinction and the pattern of reinforcement. I. Alternation of reinforcement and the conditioned eyelid response. [REVIEW]David A. Grant, Arthur J. Riopelle & Harold W. Hake - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (1):53.
The effect of varying conditions of reinforcement upon a simple running response.F. W. Finger - 1942 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 30 (1):53.
Response latency as a function of size of gap in the elevated runway.David Birch, L. Thomas Clifford & Julie Butterfield - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (2):179.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
23 (#661,981)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references