Consciousness and Cognition 14 (2):316-326 (2005)
AbstractParticipants studied lists of nonwords that were orthographic-phonologically similar to a nonpresented critical lure, which was also a nonword . Experiment 1 showed a high level of false recognition for the critical lure. Experiment 2 showed that the false recognition effect was also present for forewarned participants who were informed about the nature of the false recognition effect and told to avoid making false recognition judgments. The present results show that false recognition effects can be obtained even when the critical lure itself is not stored during study. This finding is problematic for accounts that attribute false memories to implicit associative responses or spreading activation but is easily explained by global familiarity models of recognition memory
Similar books and articles
Can False Memories Be Created Through Nonconscious Processes?René Zeelenberg, Gijs Plomp & Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers - 2003 - Consciousness and Cognition 12 (3):403-412.
Evaluating the Evidence for Nonconscious Processes in Producing False Memories.Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers & René Zeelenberg - 2004 - Consciousness and Cognition 13 (1):169-172.
How Does Recognition Emerge From Nature? The Genesis of Consciousness in Hegel’s Jena Writings.Italo Testa - 2012 - Critical Horizons 13 (2):176-196.
Critical Theory and the Two-Level Account of Recognition -Towards a New Foundation?Somogy Varga - 2010 - Critical Horizons 11 (1):19-33.
Communication, Recognition and Politics: Reconciling the Critical Theories of Honneth and Habermas.Jordy Rocheleau - 2001 - Social Philosophy Today 17:253-263.
Psi, Perception Without Awareness and False Recognition.Stuart Wilson - 2002 - Journal of Parapsychology 66 (3):271-289.
Recognition and Critical Theory Today.Gonçalo Marcelo - 2013 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (2):209-221.
Are Nonconscious Processes Sufficient to Produce False Memories?David A. Gallo & John G. Seamon - 2004 - Consciousness and Cognition 13 (1):158-168.
Criticism and Normativity. Brandom and Habermas Between Kant and Hegel.Italo Testa - 2009 - In D. Canale G. Tuzet (ed.), The Rules of Inference. Inferentialism in Law and Philosophy, Egea, Milano. Egea (pp. pp. 29-44).
Recognition and Dialogue: The Emergence of a New Field.James Tully - 2004 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (3):84-106.
Conflicts of Recognition and Critical Sociology.Christian Lazzeri - 2012 - In Miriam Bankovsky & Alice Le Goff (eds.), Recognition Theory and Contemporary French Moral and Political Philosophy: Reopening the Dialogue. Distributed Exclusively in the Usa by Palgrave Macmillan.
“It Shouldn't Have to Be A Trade”: Recognition and Redistribution in Care Work Advocacy.Cameron Lynne Macdonald & David A. Merrill - 2002 - Hypatia 17 (2):67-83.
Dissociative Effects of Alcohol on Recollective Experience.H. Valerie Curran & Michael Hildebrandt - 1999 - Consciousness and Cognition 8 (4):497-509.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Manipulations of List Type in the DRM Paradigm: A Review of How Structural and Conceptual Similarity Affect False Memory. [REVIEW]Jennifer H. Coane, Dawn M. McBride, Mark J. Huff, Kai Chang, Elizabeth M. Marsh & Kendal A. Smith - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
References found in this work
A Spreading-Activation Theory of Semantic Processing.Allan M. Collins & Elizabeth F. Loftus - 1975 - Psychological Review 82 (6):407-428.
On the Prediction of Occurrence of Particular Verbal Intrusions in Immediate Recall.James Deese - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (1):17.
A Theory for the Storage and Retrieval of Item and Associative Information.Bennet B. Murdock - 1982 - Psychological Review 89 (6):609-626.
A Retrieval Model for Both Recognition and Recall.Gary Gillund & Richard M. Shiffrin - 1984 - Psychological Review 91 (1):1-67.
Judgments of Frequency and Recognition Memory in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model.Douglas L. Hintzman - 1988 - Psychological Review 95 (4):528-551.