Quantum Discreteness is an Illusion

Foundations of Physics 40 (9-10):1476-1493 (2010)

Abstract
I review arguments demonstrating how the concept of “particle” numbers arises in the form of equidistant energy eigenvalues of coupled harmonic oscillators representing free fields. Their quantum numbers (numbers of nodes of the wave functions) can be interpreted as occupation numbers for objects with a formal mass (defined by the field equation) and spatial wave number (“momentum”) characterizing classical field modes. A superposition of different oscillator eigenstates, all consisting of n modes having one node, while all others have none, defines a non-degenerate “n-particle wave function”. Other discrete properties and phenomena (such as particle positions and “events”) can be understood by means of the fast but continuous process of decoherence: the irreversible dislocalization of superpositions. Any wave-particle dualism thus becomes obsolete. The observation of individual outcomes of this decoherence process in measurements requires either a subsequent collapse of the wave function or a “branching observer” in accordance with the Schrödinger equation—both possibilities applying clearly after the decoherence process. Any probability interpretation of the wave function in terms of local elements of reality, such as particles or other classical concepts, would open a Pandora’s box of paradoxes, as is illustrated by various misnomers that have become popular in quantum theory
Keywords Particle concept  Quantum events  Decoherence  Nonlocality
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10701-009-9383-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,340
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Quantum Gravity.Claus Kiefer - 2004 - Oxford University Press UK.
The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Measurement Process.Peter Mittelstaedt - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (4):649-651.
On the Interpretation of Measurement in Quantum Theory.H. D. Zeh - 1970 - Foundations of Physics 1 (1):69-76.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Decoherence and Wave Function Collapse.Roland Omnès - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (12):1857-1880.
On Quantum-Classical Transition of a Single Particle.Agung Budiyono - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (8):1117-1133.
The Wave Function Collapse as an Effect of Field Quantization.K. Lewin - 2009 - Foundations of Physics 39 (10):1145-1160.
On the Physical Reality of Quantum Waves.Gennaro Auletta & Gino Tarozzi - 2004 - Foundations of Physics 34 (11):1675-1694.
A Resolution of the Classical Wave-Particle Problem.J. P. Wesley - 1984 - Foundations of Physics 14 (2):155-170.
Quantum Particles and Classical Particles.Nathan Rosen - 1986 - Foundations of Physics 16 (8):687-700.
Collapse of the Quantum Wave Function.Pete A. Y. Gunter - 2009 - Process Studies 38 (2):304-318.
Overlaps in Pilot Wave Field Theories.I. Schmelzer - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (3):289-300.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-22

Total views
35 ( #246,025 of 2,271,604 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #825,223 of 2,271,604 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature