Quantum Discreteness is an Illusion
Foundations of Physics 40 (9-10):1476-1493 (2010)
Abstract
I review arguments demonstrating how the concept of “particle” numbers arises in the form of equidistant energy eigenvalues of coupled harmonic oscillators representing free fields. Their quantum numbers (numbers of nodes of the wave functions) can be interpreted as occupation numbers for objects with a formal mass (defined by the field equation) and spatial wave number (“momentum”) characterizing classical field modes. A superposition of different oscillator eigenstates, all consisting of n modes having one node, while all others have none, defines a non-degenerate “n-particle wave function”. Other discrete properties and phenomena (such as particle positions and “events”) can be understood by means of the fast but continuous process of decoherence: the irreversible dislocalization of superpositions. Any wave-particle dualism thus becomes obsolete. The observation of individual outcomes of this decoherence process in measurements requires either a subsequent collapse of the wave function or a “branching observer” in accordance with the Schrödinger equation—both possibilities applying clearly after the decoherence process. Any probability interpretation of the wave function in terms of local elements of reality, such as particles or other classical concepts, would open a Pandora’s box of paradoxes, as is illustrated by various misnomers that have become popular in quantum theoryDOI
10.1007/s10701-009-9383-9
My notes
Similar books and articles
Decoherence and Wave Function Collapse.Roland Omnès - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (12):1857-1880.
On Quantum-Classical Transition of a Single Particle.Agung Budiyono - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (8):1117-1133.
The Wave Function Collapse as an Effect of Field Quantization.K. Lewin - 2009 - Foundations of Physics 39 (10):1145-1160.
On the Physical Reality of Quantum Waves.Gennaro Auletta & Gino Tarozzi - 2004 - Foundations of Physics 34 (11):1675-1694.
Many-Hilbert-spaces approach to the wave-function collapse.Mikio Namiki & Saverio Pascazio - 1992 - Foundations of Physics 22 (3):451-466.
A resolution of the classical wave-particle problem.J. P. Wesley - 1984 - Foundations of Physics 14 (2):155-170.
Quantum particles and classical particles.Nathan Rosen - 1986 - Foundations of Physics 16 (8):687-700.
Trajectories of two-particle states for the harmonic oscillator.A. Kyprianidis - 1988 - Foundations of Physics 18 (11):1077-1091.
Embedding of Particle Waves in a Schwarzschild Metric Background.David Zareski - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (2):253-285.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-22
Downloads
62 (#194,083)
6 months
4 (#184,953)
2013-11-22
Downloads
62 (#194,083)
6 months
4 (#184,953)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Can Quantum Theory be Applied to the Universe as a Whole?Claus Kiefer - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (9-10):1410-1418.
References found in this work
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox.J. S. Bell - 2004 [1964] - In Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 14--21.
On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory.H. D. Zeh - 1970 - Foundations of Physics 1 (1):69-76.
The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Measurement Process.Peter Mittelstaedt - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (4):649-651.